Sybille Bedford’s squandered years
And their resolution!
Sybille Bedford (1911–2006)
Those of us who have a hard time keeping up our creative work on a regular basis tend to draw on a catalog of familiar excuses: If a day job isn’t draining our time and energy, then it’s the noisy neighbors, or the lack of a proper work space, or the deliriously worrying state of the world, or some other force beyond our control. So I was tickled recently to read the German-born English writer Sybille Bedford’s explanation for her modest literary output, which she described in her 2005 autobiography: “great natural sloth.”
Ha! Maybe that’s a larger component of my own inconsistent productivity than I would like to admit—though, in fairness to Bedford, it wasn’t the only reason for her years of not writing. At another point in her autobiography—titled Quicksands, it was published when Bedford was 94—she elaborated on the factors behind the “long fragments of the life I wasted in not working”:
Oh what has remained undone by sloth, discouragement, and of course distractions . . . Distractions of living the siren song of the daily round—chance, often choice led me to spend the squandered years in beautiful or interesting places: to learn, to see, to travel, to walk in nocturnal streets, swim in warm seas, make friends and keep them, eat on trellised terraces, drink wine under summer leaves, to hear the song of tree-frog and cicada, to fall in love . . . (Often. Too often.)
Now those are good excuses for not writing! In all seriousness, though, a sympathetic reader can’t help but suspect that what Bedford did write would not have been nearly as magnetic if it hadn’t been for her travels, her friendships, her affairs, and her leisurely late-night meals on trellised terraces under summer leaves. (God, that sounds lovely.)
Bedford lamented the years she “wasted in not working,” but the truth is that there were a lot of years when she did work steadily, starting in her early 40s. That’s when she wrote her first book, a sort-of travelogue based on a year in Mexico, and her first novel, A Legacy, published three years later. In Quicksands, Bedford described the conditions that finally did get her to work in a regular way. To begin with, there was a phenomenal act of generosity from a friend who “made over a part of her income for me for three years” so that Bedford could get on with her stalled Mexican travelogue. (As a New York Times headline writer once put it, Bedford was “a world-class writer and a world-class freeloader.”) On top of that, she lucked into a living situation that proved ideal: Two friends living in Rome wanted to sublet their flat, and their landlady—“aged, hostile, hard”—wouldn’t let them go unless they found a reliable, quiet replacement.
Bedford went to look at the place. The rent was cheap; the location, excellent. The only catch was that the flat was on the roof of the building, and it was really more like a hut, “a longish kind of shed cobbled together, it would seem, from tarred paper and packing-case wood.” But the interior was not bad—it had a marble bathtub—and the surrounding rooftop was a charming “profusion of tangled greenery struggling out of a variety of semi-broken tubs and urns.” So Bedford took the place, and after some help from friends fixing it up, she finally found the daily writing rhythm she had long lacked:
I bit a nail, sat down before my pages and the typewriter every morning. I worked, and it worked. Soon I never lacked for [what Hemingway called] that “one true first sentence” at the start of the writing day, and at other hours there might swim across my mind, too swiftly often to catch and hold, fragments of words, of dialogue and thoughts. . . .
After the morning’s shift, I laid out a simple Italian lunch on a card-table outside in the shade—it became very hot under the tarred paper roof during day-hours—tomatoes, an egg or two, salami, fruit, a large glass of water from one of the live springs in the Roman hills. . . .
As soon as the heat of the day abated, I went out on the roof again, preferably alone, to do some rough gardening. I took great pleasure in trying to tame some of those exuberant climbers, to give them shape, direction, support; above all water them. . . . Later, at the hour when the Roman sky loses its colour for ten minutes or so before flaming up again with the sunset, and the swifts begin their flight over in formation, I sat watching, fiasco and glass to hand. Dinner with friends later, nearer ten p.m. than nine . . .
Cleary, this was someone who had a gift for living well—and maybe in the end that trumps a gift for writing consistently? On second thought: It definitely does.
I started reading A Legacy a few weeks ago, and it is remarkable. Bedford’s prose style is something special; in a 2005 article, Joan Acocella described it better than I ever could:
speed, omission, the sharp bite of event, without the tedious explanation. She won’t waste our time on what, she assumes, we already understand. That is one of the joys of reading her: she thinks we are as sophisticated as she is. Her writing is like the conversation of a clever, worldly friend who we wish would come by more often.
For more on Bedford’s career, read the full Joan Acocella piece—or dive straight into A Legacy, reissued by New York Review Books in 2015 (pictured here poolside during a much-needed birthday-weekend getaway last month).
“HOW’S THE WRITING GOING?”
(Actually, I consider two pages a wildly productive writing day!)